The lowdown on dictionaries

A passionate writer’s relationship with her dictionary is not one to take lightly. Or monogamously. My own bookshelves hold eight different English dictionaries. (And no, I did not get the OED for Christmas, even though I gave my beloved the Ragazzini’s 2,400-page Italian-English doorstopper). And let’s not forget my French and Hawaiian tomes. Or my wonderful visual dictionary. Or my various thesauruses.

Some dictionaries are fine in a pinch, others are sturdy go-to’s for everyday fogged memories, and still others are used as heavy-duty lifters of linguistic archaeology. The difference is in the seriousness of the lexicographers and the credibility of their methods.

Dictionaries can be classified in a number of ways. They can be monolingual, bilingual, or multilingual. They can change frequently to reflect contemporary usage (Webster’s New World) or they can take the long view, concentrating on historical use (Oxford English Dictionary). Consider whether you want biographic and geographic sections (Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary), or usage notes that set you straight, say, on the difference between disinterested and uninterested (American Heritage Dictionary).

Other questions to consider: How comprehensive is the dictionary? How many “headwords” (i.e., the boldface item that launches an entry) does it contain and are there subsidiary boldface items within the entry as well? Does the entry give grammatical information (like the word class or part of speech), etymology (where the word originated), and spelling variations? Does it tell you how to pronounce the word? Does it separate syllables so that you know where to put a hyphen if the word comes at the end of a line and doesn’t fit?

Here are the dictionaries I consider top shelf:

The American Heritage Dictionary. This is a favorite of many wordsmiths, including me, for its extensive usage notes. In the Fifth Edition, word meanings use quotations from classic and contemporary writers, and etymologies trace some words all the way back to their roots in ancient Indo-European and Semitic. (This print edition includes a passkey code to download a smart-phone app.)

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. This is the dictionary often used by copy editors at magazines and publishing houses, for its careful lexicography and usage notes. If you are publishing professionally, it’s good to be in sync with your editors, so ask if this is their dictionary of first reference. (When I worked in newspapers, Webster’s New World Dictionary was the dictionary of choice because it tended to add terms more rapidly. But most literary types prefer the other dictionaries listed here.) MW also has a good online dictionary for instant answers.

Random House Unabridged Dictionary. If you’ve got a huge budget and a big bookshelf, this is a wonderful dictionary to add to the first two.

Oxford English Dictionary. If you’ve got an even huger budget and a bigger bookshelf, go for this 20+ volume dictionary, which includes citations all the way back to Beowulf. This is one for real dictionary snobs: The citations go back as far as the dictionary researchers can trace a word, so you can see how Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Mark Twain used it. It has even been the subject of a bestseller, The Madman and the Dictionary, by Simon Winchester. Many libraries make their print and digital copies of the OED available to cardholders, so you may want to check with one in your area. (Oxford also publishes smaller dictionaries, which are reputable, but not usually preferred by American publishers.)

, , ,

5 Responses to The lowdown on dictionaries

  1. Constance Hale December 9, 2010 at 4:07 pm #

    Bill Bryson, in The Mother Tongue, explains that after Noah Webster’s death in 1843,Charles and George Merriam from Springfield, Mass., bought the rights to his dictionaries. (His Elementary Spelling Book was a huge bestseller, though his massive American Dictionary of the English Language is the one he’s most remembered for.) The Merriam brothers employed Webster’s son-in-law to prepare a new volume and expunge the oddest spellings and most far-fetched etymologies. The first Merriam-Webster dictionary appeared in 1847.

  2. Mackenzie Kelly August 27, 2012 at 6:09 pm #

    Connie,
    Skeats Etymological Dictionary in an abreviated form was one of my favorate browsing dictionaries. It had more fun words than Fred (noodles acimbo) Allen.

    Mack Kelly

  3. Mackenzie Kelly August 27, 2012 at 6:14 pm #

    It would be nice if I could learn to spell. I know all these fun words.

    akimbo

    Mack.

  4. Emily Brandt August 8, 2013 at 12:15 pm #

    I send my students to the Online Etymological Dictionary. It’s as close as they’ll get to the details in the OED. It doesn’t contain many of the specialized terms that they encounter in the word lists for the Word Clues exercises, but it is very useful for teaching about the formation of English.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The digital future of the dictionary | Sin and Syntax - January 30, 2015

    […] seem old-fashioned to consult a dictionary while writing, but I can’t imagine working without a reputable dictionary nearby. “Working with word books strengthens our imaginative muscles, and in turn, strengthens […]

Leave a Reply